The 20th anniversary of the beginning of the Iraq War was earlier this year in March, so the war seems like a fitting subject for this Armistice Day or Remembrance Day or Veterans Day. My 10th anniversary Iraq War post,
"The Dogs of War," was pretty comprehensive and there's not much I'd add to it, especially if we include my other posts on
Iraq,
the war series and
torture. It's worth looking at some old and more recent pieces.
I recently rewatched two of the best documentaries on the subject, both from 2007.
No End in Sight meticulously explores why the U.S. occupation of Iraq went so badly, all the more powerful because most of the interview subjects who chronicle the debacle were conservatives and Republicans serving the Bush administration.
Taxi to the Dark Side, which won the Oscar for Best Documentary Feature, is an excellent and chilling primer on the Bush administration's torture regime.
PBS'
Frontline did a number of excellent episodes on the Iraq War and the Bush Administration, including a few good piece on torture. This
list rounds up many of the best episodes, and this
topic page has almost everything related to Iraq.
James Fallows, who wrote numerous excellent articles on Iraq before and during the war, wrote yet another fine piece this March,
"The Iraq War and Modern Memory." He also links some other retrospectives, and some of his past, key pieces on Iraq. Alternatively, you can also read some of his best contemporaneous articles in the book compilation,
Blind Into Baghdad.
Via Fallows, Responsible Statecraft hosted a symposium asking the question,
aside from Bush and Cheney, who is at fault for the Iraq War? Some of the choices are silly – and presumably the question also includes Rumsfeld by default, otherwise he'd be the obvious next choice – but a number of respondents make good picks that news junkies from the era probably know but the general public likely doesn't.
Driftglass and Blue Gal had a good podcast episode in their "No Fair Remembering Stuff" series back in March,
"Iraq War and Remembrance." This year, they also featured Charlie Pierce's 2014
epic condemnation of Bill Kristol for being a war ghoul.
The PBS
NewsHour did a few Iraq retrospectives. One piece interviewed some
American Iraq War veterans. The most interesting piece
interviewed Iraqis. (The PBS site also has an 2021 AP article that ran after Colin Powell's death,
"Iraqis still blame Powell for role in Iraq war.") A
timeline of the war piece has some use, but because it only starts when the actual war commenced, it omits significant events, including the fact that Saddam Hussein relented and allowed weapons inspectors into Iraq, but the Bush administration invaded anyway (which Bush later
lied about and the press rarely challenged). I was disappointed overall by a
Iraq War conversation with Paul Wolfowitz, Charles Duelfer and Vali Nasr, because the segment didn't deal at all with the Bush administration lying to the public and Congress to start the war – Wolfowitz is allowed to present going to war as a good faith exercise. He even defends disbanding the Iraqi army without pushback, despite widespread agreement that disbandment was one of the worst, most crippling decisions by the Bush administration about Iraq after invading, causing endless
ongoing problems. (
No End in Sight covers this in depth.) No one in the Bush administration has even ever acknowledged
who actually gave the order (Wolfowitz has been floated as a candidate). Interviewer Amna Nawaz did allow Nasr the last word, though:
It's important to think about the fact that, had this war as Ambassador Wolfowitz suggested, been conducted differently after we entered into Iraq, had we left a different legacy there, the question of the reasons we went in would not loom as large as they do right now.
When we continuously debate reasons why we went in and question the motivations of going in, it's almost we are admitting to the fact that it's better we wouldn't have gone to war, because, if we went to war, we're going to make a mess of it.
And I don't think that's a good legacy for the United States. I think how we conducted the war after we arrived is as important as the reasons why we went in.
The Bush administration lied to the American public and Congress to start a war of
choice, which is another way to say an unnecessary war, and thus inherently, deeply immoral. The Bush administration also instituted a torture regime, one of the most disgraceful, shameful actions of the U.S. in living memory. And members of the Bush administration largely got away with it, which is rather discouraging. Likewise, the Bush administration was quite authoritarian, and U.S. conservatives and Republicans have moved even further in that direction since.
I did find at least one hopeful point, though. The Pew Research Center has a superb piece,
"A Look Back at How Fear and False Beliefs Bolstered U.S. Public Support for War in Iraq," which chronicles the shifts in public opinion over the years and also recaps the political history of the Iraq War pretty well. (It even links a piece by
The Washington Post's Glenn Kessler, whose fact-checking can be hit or miss, but wrote a pretty good piece about the claim that the Bush administration lied to start the war, all spurred by former Bush press secretary Ari Fleischer claiming that it was a lie to say the Bush team lied.) In the Pew article, the most interesting parts might be these charts:
The Bush team has mostly escaped consequences, certainly legally and professionally, but public opinion definitely turned against the Iraq War and that perspective has persisted. It's telling that, from at least 2015 onward, Donald Trump
has lied to conservative and Republican voters,
falsely claiming he had always opposed the Iraq War. He was and is pandering, of course, but it's interesting that, even when speaking to the demographic groups most likely to still support the Iraq War, he's thought pretending to oppose the war would play better.
I won't link all of my previous Iraq posts, but besides
"The Dogs of War" from 2013, these are probably the most significant:
"Iraq and Vietnam: Selling the Stab-in-the-Back Myth" (8/30/07). (Note that Blogger has oddly resized some images from old posts, but trying to fix them can create other problems.)
If Shakespeare is your thing, you might appreciate
"The Knaves of the Bush Administration (3/20/07).
"Day of Shame" (2/5/08) is about Colin Powell's 2003 presentation to the United Nations about Iraq's supposed weapons of mass destruction, a collection of falsehoods that was pivotal in selling the war.
I wrote several pieces on the "surge" of American troops in Iraq.
"The Surge Is Still Not Working" (3/1/08) summarizes and links some of the others.
"John '100 Years' McCain" (4/9/08) took an in-depth look at remarks then-presidential-candidate John McCain made. His defenders complained he was taken out of context, but a fair assessment with much more context did not make him look much better.
"Giddy Minds and Foreign Quarrels" (11/11/09) was one of the key pieces in a set of interrelated posts for Armistice Day in 2009, and the one most focused on the Iraq War.
"The Graveyard of Democracy" (11/11/21) was mainly about the Afghanistan War, but there's considerable overlap with the Iraq War, of course. The post cites Brown University's "Costs of War" project, which estimates the costs of all U.S. post-9/11 war spending at
$8 trillion, which includes future obligations in veterans' care and financial debt for roughly 30 years.
May we remember history accurately, discuss decisions honestly and avoid all unnecessary wars in the future.
